Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problem
High impedance (1291)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 01/13/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that no x-rays were performed.Surgery is scheduled, but has not occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Product analysis was completed on the lead.Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.The condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No obvious anomalies were noted except for the half set of setscrew marks found near the end of the connector pin indicating the lead had not been fully inserted into the cavity of the generator at one time.The additional setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest discontinuities in the returned portion of the device which may have contributed to the stated allegation of high impedance.Note that since the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient underwent lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to lead discontinuity.The explanted lead has been returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Only a portion of the lead was returned for analysis which did not reveal any anomalies.Device failure is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2014, it was reported that the patient was seen in clinic on (b)(6) 2014 and high impedance was observed on diagnostics.The cause of the high impedance was unknown by the physician.The vns generator was not disabled at the time; however, it was stated that it would be disabled when the patient was next seen.The patient was seen again on (b)(6) 2014.Per the report, the patient was last seen on (b)(6) 2014 at which time high impedance was first observed.X-rays were not yet ordered, as it was unknown if the surgeon would want them.There was no reported trauma or manipulation, and no change in seizures.Magnet mode was run in the office and it was found that the patient no longer feels magnet stimulation.No changes were recently made to the magnet settings or other settings.The physician decided to leave the vns device turned on as the patient is not experiencing any pain.Surgery is likely, but has not occurred to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device manufacturing records and programming history were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed the device met all final testing specifications prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|