It was reported that the nurse suggested replacing the vns patient¿s device, but the patient¿s parent did not want the device touched at the time.The generator was previously programmed off.Additional information was received stating that the patient was programmed off prior to her visit with her neurologist in 2012.The patient¿s parent believed that vns was not helping the patient and that the patient¿s seizures were better without vns.In (b)(6) 2008, the neurologist discovered that the patient experienced a 50% decrease in seizure frequency during that summer although interrogation of the device at the time revealed the device was reportedly not working.The neurologist decided not to replace the device.The patient was referred for surgery to explant the device, but the surgeon decided that surgery could be dangerous and left the device implanted as it was not causing harm to the patient.Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2008.
|