• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 01/04/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient was scheduled for lead replacement surgery.Additional information was received stating that diagnostic results revealed high lead impedance and that the patient was experiencing an increase in seizures for several months.The patient¿s device was programmed off on (b)(6) 2014.Surgery has not occurred to date.Review of the available programming and diagnostic history only found diagnostic results from the day of implant which revealed normal device function at that time.
 
Event Description
The patient's mother reported that she is not going to proceed with surgery.The device has been programmed off for a couple of months and the patient is doing fine with her seizures.The patient's mother reported that the seizures are below pre-vns baseline.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records and available programming and diagnostic history were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
 
Event Description
The patient had revision surgery for the lead and generator due to high impedance.The products were received and analysis is underway, but has not been completed to-date.
 
Event Description
Analysis was completed on the returned lead and the report of lead fracture was confirmed.The lead was returned intact and a discontinuity was identified.Scanning electron microscopy identified three of the broken coil strands and surface had pitting.The remaining broken coil strand was mechanically damaged.The mating end of the electrode and one of the broken coil strands had evidence of a fatigue stress induced fracture with mechanical damage, fine pitting and a rotational stress induced fracture.The area on the remaining broken coil strands had evidence of a stress induced fracture with mechanical damage.With the exception of the observed discontinuity, no other anomalies were noted.Analysis for the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2015.The device was automatically disabled (pulsedisabled) and end-of-service warnings were set.The pulsedisabled byte would not reset.The measured battery results, confirmed an end-of-service condition.Review of the generator data showed increased impedance, from 2912 ohms to 13,088 ohms, and the date of change detection was (b)(6) 2014.The electrical test results showed that the pulse generator module performed according to functional specifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3717903
MDR Text Key4251898
Report Number1644487-2014-00843
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/06/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/31/2011
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number2239
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/10/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/16/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/01/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/13/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/16/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age16 YR
-
-