Model Number 105 |
Device Problem
Device Inoperable (1663)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/11/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the explanting facility will not returned explanted devices without patient consent; therefore, device analysis cannot not be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
An implant card was received indicating that the vns patient¿s generator was replaced due to neos = yes.Additional programming and diagnostic history was received showing normal diagnostic results through (b)(4) 2013.
|
|
Event Description
|
Follow-up with the surgeon was performed, and he reported that electrocautery was not used during the repositioning surgery on (b)(6) 2013 or during any other procedures between implant in (b)(6) 2014.It is known and addressed in device labeling that exposure of electrocautery or rf device can damage the generator and cause premature depletion.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device manufacturing records and available programming and diagnostic history were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the generator passed all functional tests prior to distribution.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the vns patient's generator showed ifi - yes.The physician reported that the generator must be faulty as it was implanted in (b)(6) 2013.It was reported that the patient underwent another surgery in (b)(6) 2013.It was reported that device diagnostics were within normal limits.The patient was referred for generator replacement.The patient underwent generator replacement on (b)(6) 2014.The generator is expected to be returned for analysis, but has not been received to date.Attempts to obtain additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|