Model Number 302-30 |
Device Problem
High impedance (1291)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/24/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent generator and lead explant.A new vns system was not implanted.The generator and lead were received for analysis.Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.Further follow-up revealed that no patient manipulation or trauma occurred that is believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance.The physician programmed the device off on (b)(6) 2014.The physician reported that x-rays were performed and the patient was referred to surgery.The plan is to have the device explanted if insurance approves.Surgical intervention has not occurred to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device manufacturing records were reviewed.Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis of the generator was completed on 08/06/2014.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Analysis of the lead was completed on 08/11/2014.Abraded openings were noted on the outer and the inner silicone tubing.A break was identified in the negative coil.Scanning electron microscopy images of the negative coil show that pitting or electro-etching conditions have occurred at the break location.Also, the negative coil shows that a stress-induced (fatigue) fracture occurred in one strand of the quadfilar coil.However, due to pitting and mechanical distortion (smoothed surfaces) the fracture mechanism of the other strands cannot be determined.Note that since the electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|