• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/02/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.It was reported that x-rays were taken and did not identify any lead discontinuity; however, a portion of the lead was not visible.The patient was seen again and subsequent device diagnostics resulted in high impedance (dc dc code - 7).The device was programmed off and the patient was referred for surgery.No surgical intervention has been performed to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient¿s device was tested and system diagnostic results revealed high impedance (dc dc ¿ 7).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Follow-up revealed that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to high impedance.The explanted devices have not been returned to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
The explanted lead and generator were received for analysis.Analysis of the generator was completed on 01/07/2015.Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.Analysis of the lead was completed on 01/09/2015.During the visual analysis the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 233mm and 241mm from the end of the connector boot.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil break (found at 233mm) and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type.Pitting was observed on the coil surface.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil break (found at 241mm) and identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with pitting on two of the broken coil strands.The remaining broken coil strand was identified as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage, no pitting and evidence of a stress induced fracture (torsional appearance) which most likely completed the fracture.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution.The abraded openings found on the outer and 1 inner silicone tubing most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubing.What appeared to be white deposits were observed on the outer silicone tubing.Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, zirconium, magnesium, sulphur and calcium.With the exception of the observed discontinuities the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key3909752
MDR Text Key4666004
Report Number1644487-2014-01666
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/04/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2009
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1545
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/15/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/15/2014
Initial Date FDA Received07/02/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/05/2014
12/05/2014
01/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age19 YR
-
-