Model Number 302-20 |
Device Problem
High impedance (1291)
|
Patient Problem
Paralysis (1997)
|
Event Date 01/01/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Further follow-up with the physician revealed that the patient did not have vocal cord paralysis when the patient was seen and the device was off.The physician does not suspect that the vocal cord paralysis is related to the high impedance.The physician reported that the high impedance was first observed on (b)(6) 2014 (9950 ohms) and the device was programmed off.The patient denies manipulation that may have caused the high impedance; however, the physician reported that the patient is known as a manipulative character.The physician indicated that he is not recommending the patient undergo replacement surgery at this time because the current symptoms are not chronic depression but are character disorder.No other relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's vocal cord is frozen, but that the patient is used to it.It was reported that the patient developed vocal cord paralysis in 2014 and it was attributed to vns stimulation.It was reported that the voice alteration was not observed with the patient.The patient's last known vns physician indicated that device diagnostics on (b)(6) 2014 were within normal limits and device settings were changed.No additional relevant information has been received to date.The patient was seen by a new vns physician and reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.It was reported that the patient has been referred for surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient was seeing a new psychiatrist who believes that the patient has depression.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
New information was received indicating that the patient feels her devices have migrated.The patient stated that she believes the device is "dead" but it is unknown at this time if this is referring to the prior device disablement or a belief that the device battery has depleted.The patient has contacted a surgeon to discuss explant of her devices.The surgeon has asked for her device to be interrogated before proceeding further.Attempts to obtain additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
An implant card was subsequently received indicating that the patient had undergone full system revision on (b)(6) 2016 due to high lead impedance.The high impedance condition (>=10,000 ohms) was verified in the operating room the day of the revision procedure.Impedance was noted to be normal with the newly implanted generator and lead.The explanted devices were discarded by the explanting facility.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the surgeon does use nurlon sutures if the case is subcutaneous procedure to secure the generator.Most of his cases are subpectoral and this is such a tight fit that he typically doesn't suture down.It is the surgeon's preference.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|