• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Tingling (2171); Chest Tightness/Pressure (2463)
Event Date 05/01/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported on (b)(6) 2014 that the patient reported pain near the generator that persisted mildly even when the device was off for several months.The patient did not believe it improved his seizures, although the surgeon¿s nurse indicated that it may have after it was initially implanted.The patient¿s device was explanted on (b)(6) 2014.The explanted device could not be returned for product analysis as the hospital does not return.Good faith attempts for further information were unsuccessful.It had been reported on (b)(6) 2014 that the patient was on low settings, output=0.25ma, and felt a pressure in the chest and tingling in the left arm.The physician didn¿t know if the issues were related to the vns.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the treating physician.He reported that the patient had reached decent settings and requested that his devices get turned off as it was felt to not be helping.The physician reported that the patient was a non-responder.Then, after aed polytherapy failed to improve his seizure control, the physician suggested to turn on his device as it has no role when not active.Once the patient agreed, he displayed a high sensitivity to very low initial stimulations and responded with coughing immediately upon an adjustment that he could not tolerate.Thus, this precipitated the patient¿s requests for a vns removal.The physician reported that this may have represented a psychological response and lack of motivation, but that it was speculative.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Outcomes attributed to adverse event, corrected data: the initial report inadvertently did not report this outcome, as explant occurred.
 
Event Description
Patient reported further information related to the device shocking (painful stimulation) him.It was noted that the physician changed the patient's settings and resulted in a shock that startled the patient.The device was then noted to have been turned off and the patient reported feeling a shock upon the device disablement.The patient reported that this resulted in the device removal.
 
Event Description
Further information was received that the patient's neurologist did not know specifics of what the patient meant by the report of: is burnt can't be removed from my c5 nerve; the metal part can't be taken outta my chest; the physician confirmed that only the generator was initially removed.The patient wanted to receive an mri therefore the patient's surgeon performed a second surgery to remove the lead.Further information was received from the patient's surgeon that the patient underwent generator explant on (b)(6) 2014 as well as removal of the distal portion of the lead.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent surgery to remove more of the lead due to patient desire for an mri.The surgeon's office did not discuss a burn; or anything related to c5 with the patient.
 
Event Description
Social media post made by the patient indicated that the device shocked him hard when turned off.The patient also reported that he could only get the battery and part of the lead/wire taken out of him.The patient also stated that the main wire is burnt can't be removed from my c5 nerve; the metal part can't be taken outta my chest.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4191919
MDR Text Key4962396
Report Number1644487-2014-02774
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/15/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/22/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/29/2008
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number015227
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/24/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/20/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age32 YR
-
-