• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL UNKNOWN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL UNKNOWN Back to Search Results
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Battery Problem (2885)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 10/30/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during generator replacement surgery due to end of service, the vns patient¿s replacement generator was connected with the existing lead and diagnostic results revealed high impedance.The surgeon reinserted the lead pin and subsequent tests showed lead impedance within normal limits.The procedure was completed but the patient device was tested again during recovery and high impedance was again observed.No tests could be performed prior to the procedure due to end of service condition.X-rays were provided to the manufacturer for further review.The generator appears in the left chest in a normal placement.The filter feed-through wires appear to be intact.The lead connector pin appears fully inserted into the generator connector block.The electrodes appeared to be placed in normal arrangement.Portions of the lead were unable to be assessed due to the quality of the images provided.Part of the lead was behind the generator and could not be assessed.No clear lead breaks or sharp angles were found in the parts of the lead that could be assessed.Based on the images provided, the cause of the high lead impedance remains unknown.No known surgical interventions for the high impedance have occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The arrangement of the electrodes could not be assessed.Additional information was received stating that the vns patient¿s device should lead impedance within normal limits (impedance value ¿ 2543 ohms) during an office visit prior to generator replacement on (b)(6) 2014.Patient manipulation or trauma is not believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance.The patient¿s device was disabled following the high impedance observation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that lead revision surgery was planned.It was later confirmed that the intervention was completed on 02/05/2015.The explanted lead has not been returned to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device.X-rays reviewed by manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized.Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently stated that the electrodes were in correct arrangement when actually the arrangement of the electrodes could not be assessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL UNKNOWN
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4278097
MDR Text Key5011127
Report Number1644487-2014-03142
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/25/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received02/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age34 YR
-
-