• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY 2CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON?; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY 2CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON?; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINA Back to Search Results
Model Number M001BP90820B0
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a cutting balloon blade was hanging off.An 8.00mm / 2.0cm / 90cm 2cm peripheral cutting balloon¿ was used to treat a fistula containing a previously implanted stent.After removing the balloon from the sheath after use, it was noticed that one of the dermatomes was not completely adhered to the balloon.The procedure was completed with this device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: investigation completed.The device was returned for analysis.A visual examination noted that one blade had detached from the balloon; however, the blade pad was still fully intact.The three remaining blades were fully bonded to the balloon and no damage was noted to the blades.The returned device was attached to an encore inflation unit.Positive pressure was applied.No leak was noted.The balloon was inflated to its rated burst pressure.The balloon inflated and deflated successfully.Visual and tactile examination of the shaft observed no kinks or damage.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a cutting balloon blade was hanging off.An 8.00mm / 2.0cm / 90cm 2cm peripheral cutting balloon was used to treat a fistula containing a previously implanted stent.After removing the balloon from the sheath after use, it was noticed that one of the dermatomes was not completely adhered to the balloon.The procedure was completed with this device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON?
Type of Device
CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINA
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key4337158
MDR Text Key5215118
Report Number2134265-2014-07713
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K070951
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/20/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/17/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/29/2016
Device Model NumberM001BP90820B0
Device Catalogue NumberBP908020B
Device Lot Number0017085957
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/22/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/04/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/17/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-