• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT ? LONG; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT ? LONG; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493911338300
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/14/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Same case as mdr id # 2134265-2014-08267.Reportable based on analysis completed on (b)(4) 2014.It was reported that crossing difficulties and hub damage occurred.  vascular access was obtained via the right femoral artery.The 30mm in length target lesion was located in the moderately calcified and moderately tortuous and 3mm in diameter left anterior descending (lad) artery.The lesion contained a <=45 degrees bend.The lesion was predilated using balloons up to 2.5x10mm.A 3.00x32mm promus element ¿ stent delivery system (sds) was selected; however the device was unable to cross the lesion and it was noted that the hub of the sds was broken.This was exchanged with another 3.00x38mm promus element ¿ long sds ; however, the device still failed to cross the lesion and the hub was also broken.The procedure was completed with a 3.0x38mm non-bsc stent.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed hypotube break.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.Device is combination product.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the stent delivery system was returned for analysis.A visual and tactile examination found multiple kinking on the hypotube shaft and the shaft itself was broken at the point of a severe kink.The hypotube broke 256mm distal from the strain relief.The bumper tip of the device showed no signs of damage.The balloon cone profiles were reviewed and no issues were noted with the overall balloon profile.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped and evenly folded and were not subjected to positive pressure.A visual examination of the stent, the outer and mid-shaft section found no issues with their profile.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROMUS ELEMENT ? LONG
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key4418440
MDR Text Key5164558
Report Number2134265-2014-08328
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
SIMILAR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/18/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/14/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/09/2015
Device Model NumberH7493911338300
Device Catalogue Number39113-3830
Device Lot Number16983522
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/10/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/18/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/27/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-