• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 105
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Erythema (1840); Unspecified Infection (1930); Injury (2348); Reaction (2414)
Event Date 10/27/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The surgeon reported that the patient¿s vagus nerve has been damaged after explant surgery.The patient was having difficulty swallowing after explant and was kept overnight as a result.The patient was put on a thickened diet with no regular liquids.Upon follow-up, the surgeon reported that the patient needed debridement and a skin flap for his wound.The patient had an allergic reaction to the device which contributed to the vagus nerve damage.It was reported on (b)(6) 2015 that the patient has had a good outcome from the thickened diet.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem, corrected data: the initial report inadvertently did not include the vagus nerve damage.Upon further follow-up, the physician indicated that it was believed the event was related to the events reported on the initial report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately two weeks after implant surgery ((b)(6) 2014), the neurologist turned on the patient¿s device to 0.25ma.During this time, the incision site became reddened.The patient¿s caregiver applied 40% zinc oxide which decreased the redness.When he saw the surgeon for follow up, the surgeon indicated that the incision had healed well.With continued increase in settings at following dosing appointment(s), it was reported that the area of the generator has become red and inflamed again in spite of the 40% zinc oxide.The neurologist advised that the patient see the surgeon.The caregiver felt like the patient¿s body may have been rejecting the device.She thought that she could see the metal of the generator through the skin.It was felt that the patient may have been picking at his device and that the mother reportedly removed the dressing earlier than advised.Hygiene may have also have been a contributing factor.The surgeon reported that the patient¿s skin over the generator has ¿basically sloughed off.¿ the patient was scheduled for explant surgery due to infection.Device diagnostics were reportedly within normal limits.Explant of the generator and portion of the lead occurred on (b)(6) 2015.At that time, the surgeon stated he felt that the issue was an allergic reaction more so than an infection.The patient saw plastic surgery on (b)(6) 2015 for the wound, they feel that they can suture rather than skin graft the chest.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer device history records were reviewed.Review of the manufacturer device history records confirmed sterilization was performed for both the generator and lead prior to distribution.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 105
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4444478
MDR Text Key5401383
Report Number1644487-2015-03688
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/30/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/23/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2016
Device Model Number105
Device Lot Number4008
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received01/27/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-