Siemens customer product support (cps) team investigated the complaint and concluded that suspect results cannot be confirmed as discrepant with the information provided.The gap in sample times and discrepancy around the use of syringe devices vs.Capillary devices suggest the discrepancy may be due to pre-analytical factors.The rapidpoint 500 analyzer, sn (b)(4) had ph, pco2 and po2 calibrations that were acceptable during the period of time surrounding the two events.In addition, all aqc samples for the period of time surrounding the two events were within acceptable published ranges.For both samples there were substantial time gaps between the two analyzer analysis times, which is not advised when analyzing patient samples for accurate gas results.In addition, the discrepancy between the samples being collected in syringe mode, yet tested in capillary mode on the rapidpoint suggests a transfer of the sample to a capillary device which is also not advised when handling a sample for accurate gas results.Siemens representative indicated that he tried to teach customer the right way to take capillary sample but it was a large team and not all were following the instructions the event occurred due to an operator error.
|