• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 02/01/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient underwent surgery to explant her device on (b)(6) 2015 due to painful stimulation.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.The explanted generator and lead have been returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway.
 
Event Description
Information was received indicating that the patient¿s device was explanted on (b)(6) 2015 due to pain.The pain was first observed in (b)(6) 2014 in the throat and at the electrode site.The physician decided to disable the device in (b)(6) 2014 for patient comfort.The physician later attempted to program the patient¿s device back on and the patient was unable to tolerate the minimal device settings.The patient reported a burning sensation at the site of implantation, which recurred every five minutes during stimulation on-times.She also complained of dysphonia and tension of the platysma muscle.The patient¿s seizure frequency remained the same.Mri was performed with the purpose of finding an epileptogenic lesion (which was actually found in that study).It was indicated that programming changes/ medication changes/ other external factors did not cause or contribute to the pain.The patient had no prior history of this particular pain prior to vns.Product analysis was completed for the generator.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the generator.Product analysis was completed for the lead.Other than typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient age; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently provided an incorrect patient age.Date of event; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently provided an incorrect event date.Event description; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently did not include all of the information available regarding the event.Date of explant; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently provided the wrong explant date of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4577017
MDR Text Key5558085
Report Number1644487-2015-04069
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/06/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2015
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number202565
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received03/24/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-