It was reported that the vns patient underwent generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to near end of service.Clinic notes were received indicating that the patient¿s device battery indicator showed 100% battery life remaining during an office visit on (b)(6) 2015; however, during an office visit on (b)(6) 2015, the battery life indicator showed 20% battery life remaining.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
|
Additional information was received from the neurologist stating that the patient did not have any surgeries since implant during which the generator may have been struck by electro-cautery.However, the neurologist did state that the patient swipes her vns magnet excessively which he believes may have contributed to the premature battery depletion.Additional information was received that the patient's device was showing ifi=yes during a follow up appointment (b)(6) 2015.The patient then underwent a generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2015 due to neos=yes.The explanting facility discarded the explanted device; therefore, no analysis can be performed.Programming data was received.Review of the received programming data revealed that upon the initial follow up appointment following the patient's (b)(6) 2014 generator replacement surgery, the generator was seen to be pulse disabled with a pulse disabled error message being seen.The eos pulse disabled condition found upon the first follow-up visit after implant surgery suggests that the device was likely hit with electro-cautery during device implant.This would account for the decreased in generator longevity.Based on the data received, the patient's recorded magnet swipes did not appear to be excessive.
|