• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE, GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM; MED-EL CONCERT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE, GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM; MED-EL CONCERT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Disconnection (1171)
Patient Problem Head Injury (1879)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the fluctuations in situ testing results were observed.There was no report of any impact to the implant site.The patient showed significant improvement in the aided thresholds with the cochlear implant, however, the patient did not show any improvement in speech perception since implantation.As per additional information received, art responses were observed on all electrodes except for 8, 11 and 12.A ct scan indicated that 10 out of 12 electrodes are inside the cochlear.Impedances of intracochlear electrodes are ok.As per implant registration card, a full insertion was achieved at implantation.Reportedly, the clinic thinks that the poor performance could be due to late implantation.Information received on march 16, 2015, stated that the patient has visited the clinic with her mother complaining about disconnection of the signal received by the patient from time to time.Parents reported a trauma to the patient forehead.In situ measurements showed fluctuations on all channels except 5 and 11.Re-implantation is considered but no date has been scheduled yet.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on received information, damage to the active electrode most likely caused by the reported trauma is to be assumed.Additionally, a partial electrode array migration into the middle ear, as confirmed by diagnostic imaging, might have been a contributory factor for the previously observed poor performance.However, to confirm a root cause, a device investigation is necessary.No date for revision surgery has been scheduled yet.Should additional relevant information be received, a follow up report will be sent.This report is otherwise an initial and final.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion damage to the active electrode likely caused by minute device mobility was determined to have led to device failure over time.Additionally, the reported accident has most likely led to further damage to the active electrode, hence also a contributing factor to the device failure.The investigation results appear to match the problems mentioned in the patient report.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
Patient has been re-implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
MED-EL CONCERT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE, GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck A-602-0
AU   A-6020
6460705562
MDR Report Key4688032
MDR Text Key5670585
Report Number9710014-2015-00269
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSA
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/06/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/16/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/13/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/06/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age8 YR
-
-