• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/20/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient underwent a full replacement on (b)(6) 2015.The generator was removed from the pocket.The pins were loosened and cleaned as well as the receptacles.Diagnostics performed again and showed a high impedance of 8476 ohms.The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis on (b)(4) 2015.Product analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient¿s vns was checked that day and a high impedance warning message was seen.The device was turned off and he was scheduled for chest and neck x-rays.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Product analysis for the generator was completed and approved on (b)(4) 2015.Results from analysis showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Review of the generator's decoder spreadsheet showed that the impedance level changed from 2691 ohms to 8248 ohms on (b)(6) 2015.Product analysis for the explanted lead was completed and approved on (b)(4) 2015.Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.The outer and inner tubing abraded openings and slice mark found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.With the exception of the abraded inner tubing, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.Note that since the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4737858
MDR Text Key5808715
Report Number1644487-2015-04584
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/29/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/31/2001
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number32327
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/08/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/01/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/15/1999
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age37 YR
-
-