• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problems Seizures (2063); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Date 04/14/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient underwent generator and lead replacement due to high impedance.The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis.Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance.The patient was referred for surgery.Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2015 note that the patient has experienced a dramatic increase in seizures since the last office visit.It was noted that there was an increase in device impedance and that may be why the patient is having increased seizures.It was reported that there is no known trauma or patient manipulation that may have caused the high impedance.It was reported that the seizures were above the patient's pre-vns baseline frequency.No known surgical interventions have been performed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Product analysis of the returned generator was completed on (b)(4) 2015.The generator performed according to functional specifications.Analysis in the product analysis lab concluded proper functionality of the generator and that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2015.Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During the visual analysis the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 306mm from the end of the connector boot.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with residual material.Pitting was observed on the coil surface.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution.During the visual analysis the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil appeared to be stretched and kinked approximately 273mm past the end of the cut / torn inner silicone tubes with a spot-weld / slug attached to the end.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and revealed a spot-weld / slug at the end of the coil attached to a portion of the ribbon.The abraded openings and slice mark found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer silicone tubing.The abraded openings found on the (-) connector pin inner silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the inner silicone tubing.For the observed dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the (+) connector ring inner silicone tubing, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process.What appeared to be white deposits were observed on the outer silicone tubing.Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium.With the exception of the observed discontinuity the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4757575
MDR Text Key5873877
Report Number1644487-2015-04648
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/07/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2010
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number200558
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/20/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age40 YR
-
-