• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1000 MED-EL CONCERT
Device Problems Extrusion (2934); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hearing Loss (1882); No Information (3190)
Event Date 04/07/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a revision surgery was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015.Additional info received stated that the electrode wire has extruded through the skin sealing the ear canal.The surgeon ordered a ct scan to check to the device placement, but the results are not known at this point in time.Details of the revision surgery are also not available yet.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it is to be returned to the mfr for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a f/u report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusions according to the information received, the patient suffered from chronic otitis media (com) and reportedly underwent closure of the external ear canal (eac), which is typically indicated in order to eradicate all sources of infection in cases of com and to create a closed and sterile environment.The reported electrode extrusion in the eac was likely due to the breakdown of the thin epithelial lining of the posterior canal wall.After a revision surgery to reposition the electrode and close the ear canal, the device remains implanted and reportedly working within specification.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
Further information states that a revision surgery was performed to reposition the electrode and close the ear canal.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device investigations did not reveal any device defect or problem which is expected to have been present whilst implanted.According to the patient report the device was explanted as the active electrode array migrated out of cochlea into the ear canal where the patient inadvertantly pulled the electrode completely out of the cochlea.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a revision surgery was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015.Additional information received stated that the electrode wire had extruded through the skin sealing the ear canal.It appears that the issue of the electrode extruding through the ear canal continued after the revision surgery and the patient inadvertently pulled the electrode out of the cochlea.The device has been explanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key4765978
MDR Text Key20749581
Report Number9710014-2015-00326
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMI1000 MED-EL CONCERT
Other Device ID Number(01) 09008737088422
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/07/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/11/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/12/2015
03/22/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
-
-