It was reported the lead had moved and the patient had less than 50 percent therapy relief.Following the stage one implant procedure, the lead was in good position.After the stage two implant procedure, it was noted the lead had moved.Mri and x-rays were done.During the lead removal, the healthcare professional (hcp) noted the lead was not perpendicular to the stimloc clip as it should have been.A new lead was implanted and the issue was resolved.
|
Concomitant medical products: product id 3389s-40, lot# va0sa86, implanted: (b)(6) 2015, explanted: (b)(6) 2015, product type: lead; product id 37651, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger; product id 37612, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2011, product type: implantable neurostimulator; product id 37085-60, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2011, product type: extension; product id 37642, serial# (b)(4), product type: programmer, patient; product id 3389s-40, lot# v603031, implanted: (b)(6) 2011, product type: lead; product id 3708660, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2015, product type: extension; product id neu_stimloc_acc, serial# unknown, product type: accessory.(b)(4).Analysis of the lead (lot # va0sa86) found the body of the lead was cut through and the product was segmented.
|