• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/30/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient¿s device showed high impedance and the patient was sent for x-rays.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
X-rays were provided to the manufacturer for review.The generator appears in the left chest in a normal placement.The filter feed-through wires appear to be intact.The lead connector pin could not be confirmed to be fully inserted into the generator connector block due to the angle of the images provided.Part of the lead was behind the generator and could not be assessed.No clear lead breaks or sharp angles were found in the parts of the lead that could be assessed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device.X-rays reviewed by manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2015.The explanted generator and lead have been returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the returned generator and lead was completed.Various electrical loads were attached to the generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The as-received internal device data showed that the last 25% change in the impedance value was estimated to have occurred on (b)(6) 2015 where the impedance value changed from a normal limits range to high lead impedance.The abraded openings found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Note that since a portion of the lead assembly including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4803338
MDR Text Key5834672
Report Number1644487-2015-04802
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/28/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/31/2010
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1928
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/12/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received09/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/08/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age9 YR
-
-