• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Seizures (2063); Tingling (2171); Dizziness (2194); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Date 05/20/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient experienced dizziness, tingling sensation in the fingers and increased perception of stimulation recently.Patient¿s dizziness and tingling sensation in the fingers were later reported to be possible partial seizures.Patient had gone to the er as she does not have a neurologist and the er nurse was informed about the magnet uses to disable the device.Additional information was received from the er nurse that the patient reported normally feeling stimulation from vns about twice a day.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient felt constant stimulation and experienced neck pain with stimulation.When magnet was taped to temporarily disable the vns, the pain was initially worse and then gone.However this repeated in a pattern where the pain was worse and then gone for a few minutes.Patient visited another hospital and the patient¿s generator was programmed off using the vns programmer.Since disablement of vns on (b)(6) 2015, patient did experience an increase in partial seizures due to loss of therapy.The patient was later seen by a nurse practitioner on (b)(6) 2015 and the vns was turned on to low settings of 0.5/30/250/30/5/0.75/60/500.Even at these settings, patient experienced coughing and voice hoarseness with stimulation and therefore medical professional decided to turn device off again and refer patient for vns replacement surgery.Diagnostics were performed and the impedance was within normal limits.The device was not at end of service.Chest x-rays were taken and no obvious issues were found.There was no trauma per patient prior to the events on (b)(6) 2015.Patient¿s previous vns settings prior to the reported events were unknown as the previous neurologist retired.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
Additional notes from patient's visit to the hospital were received.On 5/20/2015, the patient reported that she will usually have 2 stimulations throughout the day, each lasting for approximately 30 seconds.But on (b)(6) 2015, patient reported a feeling of low frequency stimulation and also reports that she had one episode of higher frequency stimulation that lasted for approximately 2 minutes.No history of similar events in the past were reported.Patient denied any other changes to her health including increased seizure activity until (b)(6) 2015.Since patient had the vns implanted, patient's family felt her seizures were shorter in duration.Device diagnostics were completed on (b)(6) 2015 and lead impedance was ok and device was not near end of service.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058 770
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4840313
MDR Text Key5936596
Report Number1644487-2015-04885
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/20/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2010
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number2202
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/26/2015
Initial Date FDA Received06/12/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/08/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age23 YR
-
-