• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PTY. LTD. PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESSOR; AUTOMATED TISSUE PROCESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PTY. LTD. PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESSOR; AUTOMATED TISSUE PROCESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number PELORIS II
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 06/08/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Leica biosystems received a complaint regarding sub-optimal processing of 30 specimens, which had been processed using either an eight (8) hours protocol in retort a or a 12 hour protocol in retort b.The complainant advised that the protocols from which sub-optimal tissue processing had been identified started on (b)(6) 2015 and completed on (b)(6) 2015.The complainant also advised that the pump hours were 2304; and that preventive maintenance has never been performed.On (b)(6) 2015, a leica field support specialist (fss) provided technical support by telephone in association with this complaint.The complainant advised that the affected tissue types comprised skin, gastro-intestinal and lipoma samples; and described the affected tissue samples from the eight (8) hour protocol as "fried" and those from the 12 hour protocol as "not processed".The complainant also advised that: "some tissues were resubmitted (extra).There are specimen that cannot be re-collected".Multiple attempts to obtain info from the complainant were made by both telephone and email between (b)(6) 2015 and (b)(6) 2015 without success, with the exception of (b)(6)2015.On (b)(6) 2015, the fss requested further detail from the complainant regarding the affected tissue samples and was advised only that: "there are specimen not diagnosed" and that he "does not have time to discuss this" in response to a query as to number of cassettes involved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Site access for a leica rep to this facility, which is located on a military base, was not provided.Instrument logs are not available for eval, because the complaint is not permitted to download the info.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the instrument logs found that bottle 4 (ethanol) was removed from the instrument at 13:47pm on (b)(6) 2015 for 4 seconds, which is not sufficient time to complete manual replacement of the reagent; and the properties of the corresponding reagent station were reset.Resetting the reagent station set the concentration to the default value configured in the reagent types definitions (100% in this instance); and reset the number of cassettes processed and the number of cycles and days to zero.Since the user has set bottle 4 (ethanol) at 13:47pm on (b)(6) 2015, this reagent would have been scheduled for the final dehydration step of the "factory 12hr xylene standard" protocol started in retort b at 07:28am on (b)(6) 2015 and the "factory 8hr xylene standard" protocol started in retort a at 07:34am on (b)(6) 2015, from which sub-optimal tissue processing was reported.Although the user affirmed in the instrument software that the concentration in bottle 4 (ethanol) was reset to 100% at 13:47pm on (b)(6) 2015, the actual concentration of the reagent in bottle 4 remained unchanged at 50.2% because the reagent had not been replaced.The minimum final reagent concentration required for ethanol is 98%.The consequences of using ethanol at a concentration less than the minimum required for the final dehydration step in a protocol is re-introduction of water into the tissue which cannot be displaced in subsequent processing steps; and contamination of reagents used in subsequent processing steps ultimately resulting in sub-optimal processing.The root cause for the sub-optimal tissue processing reported was a use error, which occurred prior to commencement of the affected protocols, and involved failure by the user to complete the manual reagent replacement process in accordance with the manufacturer instructions detailed in the leica peloris/peloris ll user manual.
 
Event Description
This hospital is located on a secure military base and authorization for a (b)(4) representative to attend the site was not provided until on (b)(4) 2015.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PELORIS RAPID TISSUE PROCESSOR
Type of Device
AUTOMATED TISSUE PROCESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEICA BIOSYSTEMS MELBOURNE PTY. LTD.
495 blackburn rd.
mount waverley, victoria 3149
AS  3149
Manufacturer Contact
495 blackburn rd.
mount waverley, victoria 3149
92117535
MDR Report Key4911478
MDR Text Key6011437
Report Number8020030-2015-00066
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IEO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/10/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberPELORIS II
Device Catalogue Number26.0008
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-