Model Number 302-30 |
Device Problem
Low impedance (2285)
|
Patient Problem
Seizures (2063)
|
Event Date 07/09/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015 a physician asked whether low impedance in diagnostic testing (60;600) is suggestive of a short circuit.The physician later reported that he does have a patient with low impedance.This low impedance was first observed on (b)(6) 2015 on a system diagnostics test.The physician did not make any changes to the patient's settings at that time.The physician indicated that the patient has an intellectual disability and therefore is unable to express any change in stimulation perception, but that the patient's seizures have been increasing since her last visit in (b)(6).Although surgery is likely, it has not occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015 the patient's generator product information was provided by the implanting facility.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient is having an evoked potential test.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(4) 2015 it was reported that the patient underwent a full revision surgery that day.Attempts were made for the return of the explanted products but they have not been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2015 the explanted generator and lead were received for product analysis.Product analysis has been completed on the generator.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.In the product analysis lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications; there were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Product analysis is still underway on the leads and has not yet been completed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Product analysis was completed on the leads on 1/25/2016.The majority of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During the visual analysis abraded openings were observed on the outer and in one area of the connector ring inner silicone tubing.The quadfilar coil appeared to be stretched and exposed.The abraded openings found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.With the exception of the abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with those that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|