It was reported that the patient reported having painful stimulation in the neck after walking in front of an mri suite with the door to the magnet open.Thus, the manufacturer's sales representative interrogated the patient's device and completed a diagnostic test which revealed high impedance on the patient's vns system.Two more diagnostic tests revealed normal impedance following the initial high impedance result.The patient's device settings were subsequently lowered but the patient continued to experience the painful stimulation, this time in the chest pocket.Thus, the patient's device was programmed off.The pain in the patient's neck returned following the device being programmed back on (b)(6) 2015, characterized as a pulling sensation in the left neck and ear.Thus, the device was again turned off, with only magnet mode current remaining on.Device diagnostics were run again which revealed normal impedance.X-rays were reviewed by the neurologist which showed the vns leads were intact.There has been no reported trauma or manipulation.The physician does not know how this high impedance event began occurring.No known surgical interventions have been performed to date.
|
Additional programming history was received and reviewed.The data obtained shows programming events from the date of the event, (b)(6) 2015, as well as a follow up visit with the treating physician on (b)(6) 2015.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient came in with the device disabled and left with device disabled as well.System diagnostic performed on (b)(6) 2015 resulted in normal impedance.The internal data decoded from the vns generator was reviewed as well.The data shows that impedance changed from 2356 ohms to 21822 ohms on (b)(6) 2015 from a 24-hour impedance measurement.System diagnostics performed later on (b)(6) 2015 showed an impedance change from 21822 ohms to 2089 ohms.Thus, the high impedance appears to have appeared and resolved all on (b)(6) 2015.No additional relevant information has been obtained to date.
|