• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE G; Implantable lead

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE G; Implantable lead Back to Search Results
Model Number 0175
Medical Device Problem Code High impedance (1291)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/04/2026
Type of Reportable Event Death
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead exhibited a gradual rise in shock impedance measurements within range.Technical services (ts) was consulted and stated there were no out of range measurements observed.This rv lead remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This product has not been returned to boston scientific and physical analysis could not be conducted.Investigation of the available information/data determined that the observed gradual rise in low-voltage shock impedance (lvsi) measurements was likely associated with calcification, as there was no conclusive evidence of compromised physical or electrical integrity of the lead.This condition may develop over time and can be reflected in a gradual and sustained increase in shock impedance measurements.Boston scientific issued a field safety notice to physicians in july 2025 regarding the potential for reliance defibrillation leads with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (eptfe) coating to exhibit a pattern of gradually increasing lvsi measurements due to calcification, which may result in elevated high-voltage shock impedance (hvsi) measurements and reduced shock efficacy.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of shock impedance high within normal limits - increasing gradually was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause traced to device design.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOTAK RELIANCE G
Common Device Name
Implantable lead
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CPI - Del Caribe
guidant puerto rico b. v.
#12, rd. #698
dorado PR 00646
Manufacturer Contact
mark mischke
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
+1(612)875-7234
MDR Report Key50002370
Report Number2124215-2026-39797
Device Sequence Number10624872
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier00802526373732
UDI-Public(01)00802526373732(17)060525
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P910073
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2004
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/04/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/25/2006
Device Model Number0175
Device Catalogue Number0175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/06/2026
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/27/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/04/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured05/25/2004
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Death;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-