|
|
| Catalog Number |
1190200 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Abdominal Pain (1685)
|
| Date of Event |
06/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided:
(b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with left and right inguinal hernias and umbilical and incarcerated ventral hernias thereby underwent laparoscopic and open repair with implant of 3dmax (device 1 and 2) and synthetic mesh.Per op notes, "on the left inguinal region, a large direct hernia was identified and reduced.An indirect hernia was identified and reduced.A 3dmax (device 1 - left) was placed and tacked.On the right inguinal region, a direct and indirect hernia sacs were identified and reduced.A 3dmax (device 2 - right) was placed and tacked.Periumbilical defect and umbilical defect were noted with incarcerated omentum were reduced.A synthetic mesh was placed and sutured."
(b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with infection and inflammatory reaction due to prosthetic device in the abdominal wall thereby provided with antibiotics.(b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with chronic abdominal wall wound infection with mesh thereby underwent open repair with excision of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, "sinus draining was opened and drained.Dissection carried to the fascia and identified the synthetic mesh.The synthetic mesh was removed.The fascia was closed with sutures."
(b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of phasix flat mesh (device 3).Per op notes, "midline incision was made.The hernia sac was identified and dissected.The sac was excised.The contents were reduced.A phasix flat mesh (device 3) was placed and sutured."
(b)(6) 2019 - patient had abdominal pain and underwent ultrasound/x-ray and hernia repair.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the date of event (15-jun-2019) and manufacturing date (15-oct-2016) are considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the phasix flat mesh (device 3).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the 3dmax mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|