| Model Number |
M006D2201-0032 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Urinary Frequency / Polyuria (2275)
|
| Date of Event |
06/21/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had water vapor energy therapy performed on (b)(6) 2023 with no device malfunctions or any serious adverse events.Six injections were performed on the right and left lobe, and 1 injection was on the middle lobe with minor bleeding in each case.On (b)(6) 2026 the patient visited the hospital for a follow up after three years.During the visit it was confirmed that there were new or worsening lower urinary tract symptoms and the patient was re-treated with the rezum device.The procedure was completed with the rezum device; however, a patient outcome was not reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2023, a water vapor energy therapy was performed, and the procedure was completed without any device malfunction or serious adverse event.There were 6 injections were performed on the right and left lobe and 1 injection on the middle lobe with minor bleeding in each case.On (b)(6) 2026, a patient visited the hospital for a follow up after 3 years.It was confirmed that there were new or worsening lower urinary tract symptoms, and the patient received re-treatment with rezum.The procedure was completed with this device.The patient outcome information was not reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.The reported patient symptoms are a known risk associated with this device type as indicated in the instructions for use.Risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of urinary frequency was defined in the product risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.The device history record (dhr) review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.Based on the reported clinical observations and investigational findings, the probable cause for this event was determined to be adverse event related to procedure.There are procedural-related factors that may have contributed to the observed issue including treatment with rezum delivery device, leading to the reported allegations, which according to the instructions for use and hazard analysis documentation are all adverse events related to device or procedure following active treatment with rezum.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of adverse event related to procedure was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.There was no report of a device performance allegation.The reported patient symptom(s) are known risk associated with this device type and indicated as such in the instructions for use.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|