|
C.R. Bard, Inc. (BASD) -3006260740 PowerPort M.R.I. Implantable Port, ChronoFlex Single-Lumen, 8F; Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intravascular
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1808550 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Diarrhea (1811); Nausea (1970); Pain (1994); Sepsis (2067); Vomiting (2144); Embolism/Embolus (4438)
|
| Date of Event |
04/20/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent a port placement procedure using a powerport m.R.I.Isp.Post the procedure on (b)(6) 2026, the patient reportedly experienced significant bleeding from the device site.Subsequent evaluation, including x-ray imaging, revealed an alleged crack in the port.The procedure was completed using an alternative device.The port was scheduled for explanation; however, the procedure was not performed due to the patient's hospitalization.The removal was subsequently rescheduled for (b)(6) 2026, but the device was again not explanted for unspecified reasons.Following continued concerns regarding the patient's condition and suspected sepsis, the patient was evaluated at the hospital.On (b)(6) 2026, chest x-ray and contrast-enhanced ct imaging reportedly confirmed that the port-a-cath catheter had fractured and migrated from its original position into the right atrium, extending into the pulmonary artery.The majority of the fractured catheter was subsequently retrieved via a groin-access procedure.Following the retrieval procedure, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (icu) for three days.Also, the patient experienced not feeling well, septic, nauseous, pain in the abdomen, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, catheter fragment embolism.The hospital was going to call to get another put in but the patient passed away.Also, line got taken out on the (b)(6) 2026, the rest of the port remained until he died.Upon additional information received from the customer, the patient expired due to unspecified causes.The relationship of the adverse event was determined to be not related to the device and not related to the reported malfunction.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: additional information was received and the patient died of other complications.The relationship of the death was determined to be not related to the malfunction of the device.Date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as 01-jan-1900 for the mdr submission requirement,
as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|