| Model Number |
H74939335150610 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/29/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that additional intervention was required.A 6f guidezilla ii was selected for use in the left coronary artery.During the procedure, it was noted that the catheter tip could not cross the left coronary lesion.The device was removed with the help of a balloon.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications, and the patient condition following procedure was stable.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that additional intervention was required.A 6f guidezilla ii was selected for use in the left coronary artery.During the procedure, it was noted that the catheter tip could not cross the left coronary lesion.The device was removed with the help of a balloon.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications, and the patient condition following procedure was stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1 - initial reporter phone number: (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1 - initial reporter phone number: (b)(6).With all the available information, boston scientific concludes:
device analysis findings:
the device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Device history record (dhr) review:
review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications prior to distribution.Labeling review:
review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Investigation conclusion:
this investigation has been assigned the conclusion code of adverse event related to procedure following a review of the reported event details, available information, and product record review.In this case, it was not possible to confirm the presence or absence of the reported issue with the device since it was not returned for analysis.However, it is likely that the issue could be related to an excessive force applied to the device during procedure, as well as operational or procedural factors such as handling/technique of the user causing the reported event.Regarding the reported additional device required, according to the event description, the event may have been caused by a possible device malfunction that resulted in the reported issue.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|