|
The reported event was confirmed as manufacturing related.The reported failure was able to be reproduced.The product was used for urological care.Based on the evaluation, a tear was found on the rubberized layer causing interlumen leakage.Hence, this complaint was confirmed related to manufacturing process.A potential root cause for this failure could be insufficient latex strength, low/non-uniform rubberize thickness, incorrect wire pressing technique, incorrect stripping technique etc.No deviations or nonconformances related to the reported issue were identified.The labeling / packaging record review did not identify any labeling / packaging related conditions associated with the reported failure mode.Manufacturing process indicates that the process is capable of producing of this type of defect.However, a review of the device history record did not show any problems or condition that would have contributed to the reported issue.Current in process controls per pfmea are adequate to identify the defect or verify the product integrity.Therefore, no additional action required at this time.Corrections: d,e,h.Udi format updated with available product information per gudid.H11: section a through f, the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|