|
The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2025(b)(6) in ada 4.Details of surgery: primary stability not achieved, implant surface not completely covered with bone and sinus perforation.On 2026(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified.The device was forwarded to the manufacturer.At the event the patient experienced: infection, peri-implantitis, pain, mobility, bleeding, abscess and fistula.No further patient complications were reported.
|
|
The batch number could be verified.Our manufacturing q-system assures,
that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches
confirm to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.?
the loss of an endosseous dental implant after successful
osseointegration and restoration is a known inherent risk of the
procedure.Implants may have to be removed in case one or more of the implant
success criteria are not met.Implant success criteria according to buser et al.(1991) are:
1.Absence of persistent subjective complaints such as pain, foreign
body sensation and /or dysesthesia
2.Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration
3.Absence of implant mobility
4.Absence of a continuous radiolucency around the implant.The manufacturer's trend analysis confirms that the reported failure
rate associated with its dental implants is below the expected failure
rate for this treatment as published in the scientific literature.
|