| Catalog Number |
SRF-520 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Necrosis (1971)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "breast implant replacement due to trauma induced rupture in the contralateral breast".Later healthcare professional reported "breast wound dehiscence with skin/soft tissue necrosis and exposed implant".This record is for the left side.The device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "breast implant replacement due to trauma induced rupture in the contralateral breast".Later healthcare professional reported "breast wound dehiscence with skin/soft tissue necrosis and exposed implant".This record is for the left side.The device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Continued e1: alternate email address: (b)(6).Reason for reoperation: "breast wound dehiscence with skin/soft tissue necrosis and exposed implant".The event of "breast wound dehiscence with skin/soft tissue necrosis and exposed implant" is a physiological complication and analysis of the device generally does not assist abbvie in determining a probable cause for this event.A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Further information regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: d9, h3, h6.Device evaluation:
per the analysis performed, the assessments of the complaints and any potential manufacturing issue are displayed along with any further actions required:
- exposure: unable to observe through visual inspection as it is a physiological phenomenon.- necrosis: unable to observe through visual inspection as it is a physiological phenomenon.None of the other observations performed during the device analysis deformation and creases are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, and, therefore, no further actions are required for these observations.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|