| Model Number |
H749201001900 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/06/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that removal difficulty occurred.The 70% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly calcified and mildly tortuous carotid artery.A 190 cm filterwire was prepared outside the patient.The filter was deployed and recaptured into the delivery sheath in a saline bath without issue.A long sheath was positioned and the filterwire was then advanced in the patient to the target location.During deployment, significant resistance was encountered, and the filter could not be completely deployed.The physician attempted to recapture the filter, but retrieval was difficult.The filterwire was withdrawn using the long sheath, and the pushing guidewire was found to be kinked and deformed.The procedure was completed with a non-bsc device.The patient remained stable following the procedure, and no patient complications were reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that removal difficulty occurred.The 70% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly calcified and mildly tortuous carotid artery.A 190 cm filterwire was prepared outside the patient.The filter was deployed and recaptured into the delivery sheath in a saline bath without issue.A long sheath was positioned and the filterwire was then advanced in the patient to the target location.During deployment, significant resistance was encountered, and the filter could not be completely deployed.The physician attempted to recapture the filter, but retrieval was difficult.The filterwire was withdrawn using the long sheath, and the pushing guidewire was found to be kinked and deformed.The procedure was completed with a non-bsc device.The patient remained stable following the procedure, and no patient complications were reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1: initial reporter city -(b)(6)e1: initial reporter facility number -(b)(6).Detailed information was not provided to bsc.A good-faith effort was made to acquire the necessary information.Since we are unable to provide specific details at this time, a supplemental report will be submitted if additional information becomes available in the future.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1: initial reporter facility number - (b)(6).Investigation results:
device history records (dhr) review:
it was confirmed this device met manufacturing specifications prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations that could have contributed to the reported event
investigation conclusion:
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, the most probable cause for this complaint was cause traced to device design.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|