|
Per information provided:
on (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated umbilical hernia with small bowel obstruction thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralight st mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, "an incision was made above the umbilicus down towards the umbilicus.Near the umbilicus area the hernia sac was identified and taken down sharply.A ventralight st mesh (device 1) was placed into the defect and closed the defect with sutures."
on (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction, adhesions thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of abdominal lysis of adhesions and release of small bowel obstruction.Per operative notes, "an incision was made into the umbilical region.There were some adhesions in the anterior abdominal wall which were taken down sharply.The small bowel obstructions were then released from abdomen.The defect was closed with sutures."
on (b)(6 )2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia, thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st mesh (device 2).Per operative notes, "a transverse incision was made in the left upper quadrant.The hernia sac was dissected out.There were no significant adhesions to the abdominal wall.A ventralight st mesh (device 2) was placed into the peritoneal cavity and secured it with sutures."
on (b)(6) 2023 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral incisional hernia, adhesions, scar tissue thereby underwent open repair with implant of phasix st mesh (device 3) and explant of ventralight st mesh (device 1 & 2).Per operative notes, "a vertical midline incision was made through old incision.The hernia sac was dissected out.Some dense adhesions were taken down sharply from the abdominal cavity.There was some scar tissues present with old meshes ventralight st mesh (device 1 & 2).Both meshes (device 1 & 2) were excised entirely.A phasix st mesh (device 3) was placed into the lateral abdominal wall and secured it with sutures.".
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2018) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the ventralight st mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventralight st mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|