|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a 27 mm navitor vision valve was selected for implant using a large flexnav delivery system.Pre-procedure, the patient was in normal sinus rhythm (nsr).The patient had no reported history of right bundle branch block (rbbb), left bundle branch block (lbbb), or first-/second-degree atrioventricular block.The membranous septum length was reported as less than 3 mm.No calcification extending beneath the aortic annular plane into the interventricular septum was reported.Access was obtained via the femoral approach.During the procedure, pre-dilation was performed using a 22 mm non-abbott balloon.During loading, no issues were reported retracting the valve into the delivery system.No issues were reported leading the retainer tabs into the retainer receptacle.No increase in drag was noted on the deployment/re-sheath wheel during loading.While in the cusp overlap view (cov), the inflow edge of the constrained valve within the capsule was positioned at the base of the aortic annulus and the pigtail position was confirmed at the bottom of the non-coronary cusp (ncc).During 80% deployment, the valve would not stay in place and repeatedly slipped down into the left ventricle (lv).There was sufficient calcium present to support the expectation that the valve would not move ventricularly.Annular measurements performed by both the reporter and the hospital were reportedly consistent with sizing for a 27 mm valve.It was further reported that the presence of sinotubular junction (stj) calcium was not believed to be influencing the valve movement, as the calcium was located above the valve frame height.At approximately 80% deployment of the navitor valve, the patient developed complete heart block.After three recaptures, the physician decided to abort the navitor implantation and implant a 23 mm non-abbott valve.The navitor valve was not implanted.The 23 mm non-abbott replacement valve was successfully implanted.Post-procedure electrocardiogram (ecg) showed complete heart block and the patient left the cath lab with a temporary pacemaker in place.It was further reported that a permanent pacemaker was required following the procedure.The patient did not experience a prolonged hospital stay for rhythm monitoring.The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure.No clinically significant delay was reported.The physician attributed the complete heart block to valve interaction with the patient's anatomy.The patient was discharged.
|