|
The agent reported "(patient was experiencing some laxity and a poly swap was performed.The surgeon up sized the poly from: 346-14-710 to 346-19-710)".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 1 year and 6 months apart.Item number: 346-14-710
item description: empowr vvc kneetm tibial insert, size 10, 14mm
lot number: 452v1006
part revision: a
product type: knee
manufacture date: 02/26/19
expiration date: 02/22/24.This evaluation is limited in scope as the item associated with this investigation was not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported device was defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.Root cause:
the root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to laxity and poly swap.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.Containment:
inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.The revision surgery was completed successfully.Device history records review:
a review of the device history record (dhr) shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There was no non-conforming material report (ncmr) associated with the product that may have contributed to the reported event.The device was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Complaint history:
customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.
|