• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD. BACTEC PEDS PLUS; System, Blood Culturing

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD. BACTEC PEDS PLUS; System, Blood Culturing Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 442020
Medical Device Problem Code False Negative Result (1225)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/26/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported while using bd bactec¿ peds plus¿/ f culture vials (plastic), there was one false negative result.No adverse impact was reported regarding the patient or user.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: introduction: material #: 442020 lot/batch/serial #: unknown customer claim: i request verification of the bactec equipment.The equipment released a sample with a negative result on (b)(6) at 5:45 pm, and hours later (7:46 pm) it reported that the same sample was positive.And when we performed the plate culture, the sample was positive.Attached is a screenshot of the audit report.Returned material analysis: epicenter reports were provided; however, the corresponding plots were not available for review.Investigational testing/ review: waters was not able to perform an investigation to the retention samples since batch number is unknown.The sensor inside the vial will not appear visibly different in positive and negative vials, however, the bd bactec¿ fluorescent series instrument can determine a difference in fluorescence.If at the end of the testing period a negative vial appears visually positive (i.E., chocolatized blood, bulging septum, and/or lysed), it should be subcultured and gram stained and treated as a presumptively positive.For maximum yield of isolates, negative cultures may be checked by stain and/or subcultured prior to discarding as negative.False negative readings may result when certain organisms are present which do not produce enough co2 to be detected by the system or significant growth has occurred before placing the vial into the system.Conclusion/outcome: based on the available information, the complaint could not be confirmed.The batch/lot number was not provided; therefore, retention sample testing, lot-specific complaint history review, and batch history record review could not be performed.No objective evidence was available to support a product-related failure.Consequently, no corrective actions were required.A cross-functional team continues to monitor product complaints for trends and determines whether additional actions are warranted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BACTEC PEDS PLUS
Common Device Name
System, Blood Culturing
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD.
vicks drive
lot no. 6
cayey PR
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD.
vicks drive
lot no. 6
cayey PR
Manufacturer Contact
matt j. connor
7 loveton circle
sparks, MD 21152
+1(410)316-4000
MDR Report Key50303791
Report Number2647876-2026-00091
Device Sequence Number18799090
Product Code MDB
UDI-Device Identifier30382904420209
UDI-Public(01)30382904420209
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K151866
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/15/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue Number442020
Device Lot Numberunknown
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/28/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/15/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/18/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/30/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-