|
It was reported that during a left atrial appendage closure procedure, a versacross was selected for use.The physician obtained groin access and performed a transseptal puncture with the versacross connect as normal.The trusteer was advanced to the left side of the heart and exchanged for a pigtail wire to take a contrast shot.While attempting to advance the sheath, the physician noted difficulty and resistance.Fluoroscopy was performed, revealing a kinked sheath.At that point, a new trusteer was opened, and no effusion was observed.To exchange, the versacross pigtail wire was re-advanced to the left side to maintain the same transseptal puncture.The second trusteer was advanced smoothly to the left side without resistance.However, an effusion was then noted, and the physicians prepared for a pericardiocentesis.A cardiac tamponade also occurred.Approximately 200cc of fluid was drained, protamine was administered and the effusion stabilized.The physician believed the effusion occurred while exchanging.Due to the effusion, the decision was made not to proceed with watchman implantation.It was also reported that resistance was encountered when attempting to advance the trusteer closer to the appendage.The guidewire used was the wire included in the versacross connect box.The patient was held overnight and discharged with no further treatment post complication.
|