|
Block h6:
device code a020503 is being used to capture the reportable event of seal compromised.Block h11:
device evaluation:
the overstitch ess was not returned for evaluation, and no media was available for analysis.The reported event could not be confirmed.Product analysis could not be performed, for this reason and due to the lack of evidence the reported event is unable to be confirmed.A risk review of the overstitch ess was completed and confirmed that the event of packaging seal compromised was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.It was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.A similar complaint review was completed.There were no emerging trends identified that warrant further action.A labeling review was performed.There is no evidence the device was improperly used per the instructions for use (ifu), and there is no evidence that there is any issue with translation, wording, or graphics of the ifu/labeling information.Based on all gathered information, there is not enough evidence to determine whether the packaging seal compromised was due to the physician's technique during the device preparation, transport, storage or was related to a device malfunction.Without proper evaluation of the device, it remains unknown the most probable causes that contributed to the event.Also, the evidence from the product record review did not identify a potential product quality issue or new patient harm.All compiled information on this investigation determines that the most probable cause is cause not established.
|