| Model Number |
M00505430 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/27/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an overstitch nxt was used during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) stent placement procedure on (b)(6)2026.During the procedure, the device was caught on the stent.The stent and overstitch were removed, and the case started over.The procedure was completed with a new overstitch nxt.There was no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an overstitch nxt was used during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) stent placement procedure on july 27, 2026.During the procedure, the device was caught on the stent.The stent and overstitch were removed, and the case started over.The procedure was completed with a new overstitch nxt.There was no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Imdrf code f2301 captures the reportable event of additional device required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6
imdrf code f2301 captures the reportable event of additional device required.Block h11
device evaluation
the overstitch nxt was not returned for evaluation, and no media was available for analysis.The reported event could not be confirmed.A risk review of the overstitch nxt was completed and confirmed that the events of device interaction with another device and additional device required were defined in the risk documentation.These event types have been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.It was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.A similar complaint review was completed.There were no emerging trends identified that warrant further action.There is no evidence the device was improperly used per the instructions for use (ifu), and there is no evidence that there is any issue with translation, wording, or graphics of the ifu/labeling information.Based on all gathered information, there is not enough evidence to determine whether the device interaction with another device was due to the physician's technique during the procedure or was related to a device malfunction.Additionally, for the event additional device required, it happened during the procedure, and the most probable cause of this reported issue cannot be established due to lack of evidence.Without proper evaluation of the device, it remains unknown the most probable causes that contributed to the event.Also, the evidence from the product record review did not identify a potential product quality issue or new patient harm.All compiled information on this investigation determines that the most probable cause is cause not established.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|