| Model Number |
H74939419501510 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Restenosis (4576)
|
| Date of Event |
12/03/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that target lesion revascularization occurred requiring additional intervention.The target lesions were located in the left common femoral artery, proximal superficial femoral artery, distal superficial femoral artery, and proximal popliteal artery.On (b)(6) 2025, a 6 x 150 mm, 150 cm ranger drug-coated balloon was used to treat target lesion #001, and a 5 x 150 mm, 150 cm ranger drug-coated balloon was used to treat target lesion #002.Both balloons were inflated once at 10 atmospheres for 180 seconds.On (b)(6) 2026, the patient underwent an interventional revascularization procedure consisting of shockwave therapy, rotarex atherectomy, and drug-coated balloon angioplasty and the event was considered resolved on (b)(6) 2026.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that target lesion revascularization occurred requiring additional intervention.The target lesions were located in the left common femoral artery, proximal superficial femoral artery, distal superficial femoral artery, and proximal popliteal artery.On (b)(6) 2025, a 6 x 150 mm, 150 cm ranger drug-coated balloon was used to treat target lesion #001, and a 5 x 150 mm, 150 cm ranger drug-coated balloon was used to treat target lesion #002.Both balloons were inflated once at 10 atmospheres for 180 seconds.On (b)(4) 2026, the patient underwent an interventional revascularization procedure consisting of shockwave therapy, rotarex atherectomy, and drug-coated balloon angioplasty and the event was considered resolved on (b)(6) 2026.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A4: weight: 114.8 kg.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A4: weight: 114.8 kg
investigation results:
device history records (dhr) review:
review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications prior to distribution.Labeling review:
review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Risk review:
a risk review performed for the ranger (dcb) device confirmed that the reported event is a known event defined in the product's risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefits for the product.Investigation conclusion:
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, the most probable cause for this complaint was adverse event related to patient condition.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|