| Lot Number |
0039272031 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bradycardia (1751); Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
08/04/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It has been reported that bradycardia, pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade occurred post procedure 3hrs later.Farawave was selected for use and during a transesophageal echocardiogram (tte), a pericardial effusion was noted.Patient was brought back into the room to get a pericardiocentesis.Pigtail versacross was used in the procedure.The patient has been discharged.The device is not expected to be returning as it has been disposed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It has been reported that bradycardia, pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade occurred post procedure 3hrs later.Farawave was selected for use and during a transesophageal echocardiogram (tte), a pericardial effusion was noted.Patient was brought back into the room to get a pericardiocentesis.Pigtail versacross was used in the procedure.The patient has been discharged.The device is not expected to be returning as it has been disposed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D2a: common device name: percutaneous cardiac ablation catheter for treatment of atrial fibrillation with irreversible electroporation; reported here as the common device name exceeded the character limit for designated field.It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction to section g2 report source
d2a: common device name: percutaneous cardiac ablation catheter for treatment of atrial fibrillation with irreversible electroporation; reported here as the common device name exceeded the character limit for designated field.Investigation summary
with all the available information, boston scientific is unable to confirm cause of the reported clinical observation of cardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion and bradycardia.The device has not been received for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.Device history record review
it was confirmed this device met specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Risk review
a risk review performed for the farawave device confirmed that the event of cardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion and bradycardia are known event defined in the product risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Labeling review
based on the information provided, there is no evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications/instructions for use (ifu).Investigation conclusion
boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause not established and supporting evidence that came to this conclusion.Boston scientific investigation findings were unable to establish a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported event.The device met all requirements prior to being approved for final distribution/sale and there was no evidence to suggest that the instructions for use (ifu) was not followed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|