| Model Number |
M001508110 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/05/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that tip detachment occurred.The patient underwent transcatheter internal iliac artery embolization for bladder hemorrhage.A 200cm x 10cm fathom-14 guidewire was selected for use.However, during the procedure, while advancing the guidewire through the microcatheter under digital subtraction angiography (dsa) guidance, the tip of the guidewire remained stationary despite multiple attempts to advance it.The guidewire and microcatheter were withdrawn together.Upon external inspection, it was noted that the guidewire tip was detached.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event, and the patient was stable post-procedure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that tip detachment occurred.The patient underwent transcatheter internal iliac artery embolization for bladder hemorrhage.A 200cm x 10cm fathom-14 guidewire was selected for use.However, during the procedure, while advancing the guidewire through the microcatheter under digital subtraction angiography (dsa) guidance, the tip of the guidewire remained stationary despite multiple attempts to advance it.The guidewire and microcatheter were withdrawn together.Upon external inspection, it was noted that the guidewire tip was detached.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications as a result of this event, and the patient was stable post-procedure.It was further reported that the target lesion was non-stenosed, non-tortuous, and non-calcified.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B5.Describe event or problem: added information, based on additional information.Media review:
the device was not returned.However, a photo was provided from the healthcare facility.It shows the distal tip was detached.Device history record:
it was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Investigation conclusion:
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of adverse event related to procedure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|