|
A barostim system was implanted on (b)(6) 2025.On (b)(6) 2025, the patient reported issues with healing around the pocket location.It was noted that the wound had healed, but there was slight swelling.It was noted that prior to the wound healing there was some fluid drainage that had been present.There were also significant impedance changes that occurred between (b)(6) 2025 and (b)(6) 2025.An x-ray was performed, but results were not shared.As of (b)(6) 2025, no additional intervention was planned.In the opinion of the physician, the wound complaints were due to the patient "picking" at the wound site.The patient's device was successfully explanted on (b)(6) 2026 and there were no plans to reimplant the patient.
|
|
While analysis was unable to be performed as the device was not returned, in the opinion of the physician, the wound complaints were due to the patient "picking" at the wound site.The device history and sterilization record for this device serial number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.Bioburden, pyrogen, lal, and cleanroom cae testing results were below control limits for the quarter the ipg was manufactured.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Cvrx id# (b)(4).
|