|
Per information provided:
(b)(6) 2013- patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia, left inguinal hernia, thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plugs (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, "in the right inguinal region, previously placed mesh was found pulled away and there was hernia with omentum.The omentum was reduced an dwas repaired by placing perfix plug (device 1) and sutured.Then on the left inguinal region, direct hernia was identified and was dissected.An extra large perfix plug (device 2) was placed and sutured."
(b)(6) 2016- patient was diagnosed with recurrent bilateral inguinal hernias, thereby underwent robotic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, "some adhesions in the right inguinal area along with indirect hernia was identified.There was a recurrent direct hernia and the perfix plug (device 1) was found pulled away from pubic tubercle area.A synthetic mesh was placed covering the entire inguinal canal and sutured.There was a large piece of mesh (perfix plug-device 2) was found crumpled up and stuck to the spermatic cord.There was a recurrent indirect hernia.Another synthetic mesh was then placed and sutured.".
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2012) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the bard perfix plug (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard perfix plug (device 1).Note: section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|