|
Per information provided:
(b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with left upper quadrant trocar site incisional hernia, umbilical hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralex st meshes (device 1, 2).Per op notes, ¿the hernia defect was noted in left upper quadrant.A ventralex st mesh (device 1) was placed and laid against anterior abdominal wall using sutures.Attention to the umbilical hernia, a large ventralex st mesh (device 2) was placed against the hernia defect using sutures.¿
(b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient had adhesions thereby underwent open repair with the lysis of adhesion.Per op notes, ¿adhesion to the mesh (device 2) in umbilicus was lysed.The mesh was divided.¿
(b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with nonhealing midline abdominal wound thereby underwent open repair.Per op notes, ¿the fluid filled at the superior aspect of wound.The pus was drained.Nonviable tissues were debrided.¿
(b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient had chronic drainage and was diagnosed with non healing surgical wound, mesh infection thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per op notes, ¿the chronic drainage was noted.All the mesh was excised.Due to incorporation of mesh, patient umbilicus and fascia was excised.A biological mesh was placed on the top of fascia using staples.¿.
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.This mdr represents the ventralex st (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventralex st (device 1).Note, the manufacturing date (15-nov-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|