|
The trial insert 10mm did not engage the trial tibial baseplate since the anterior clipping part of the trial insert was broken.The cause and the timing of the breakage was unknown.The surgery was completed successfully, but the insert thickness was selected without an adequate trial reduction.The surgery time was 3 hours, and the delay time was 30 minutes.
|
|
Batch review performed on 29 jul 2026 lot 2613339: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 11-jun-2026.Expiration date: 25-may-2031.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Considering the semifinished lot (mat88198) of the device involved in this complaint, (b)(4) items were manufactured and released 19-mar-2026.To date, no similar events have been reported on the same semifinished lot during the period of review.Considering the semifinished lot (mat88594) of the device involved in this complaint, (b)(4) items were manufactured and released 13-mar-2026.To date, no similar events have been reported on the same semifinished lot during the period of review.R&d analysis the visual analysis confirms the difficulty of clipping the efficiency trial inserts into the trial baseplate.The reason for this complaint could be that, during the initial insertion, the baseplate connection features became slightly deformed or damaged, making clipping more difficult.To improve the baseplate-trial insert connection system, the baseplate design has been updated to ensure insert stability through the addition of lateral retaining walls, as is currently implemented in the metal instrumentation.Root cause: based on the available information, no definitive root cause can be established, while the investigation does not indicate a potential manufacturing-related issue or systemic deficiency.
|