|
It was reported that patient suffered a dislocation.Dr informed me that the patient would like to perform a head and liner exchange.The patient was already implanted with a depuy constrained liner and 32 +5 ts ceramic head.Those components were removed.Dr was unsure of when that revision took place or when the original surgery date was.Once those implants were removed, a new constrained liner was opened and implanted.The patient opted to go with a +4 neutral constrained liner this time as opposed to the +4/10 degree.A new ts 32+5 head was implanted and reduced.Stability was confirmed and the closing process began.No delays or adverse events took place.Activity level, yes.Doi.Unknown.Dor.(b)(6) 2026.Affected side.Right.
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary.No device associated with this report was received for examination.The product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A records evaluation (mre) was not performed.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history.There is no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|