|
The agent reported, "this was a revision surgery that the concern was the exactech humeral stem.He just switched out the glenosphere.Female 77".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 11 months, 8 days apart.Item number: 508-36-103,
item description: glenoid, head w/retaining screw, rsp, 36mm, -4mm,
lot#: 871c1526,
part revision: j,
product type: shoulder,
manufacture date: 21-jul-2025,
expiration date: 16-jun-2031.This evaluation is limited in scope as the item(s) associated with this investigation was not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported device(s) was defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.Root cause:
the root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery prompted by concern regarding the exactech humeral stem; however, no device-related failure of the humeral stem was identified, and the stem was retained while the glenosphere was replaced.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of enovis surgical.Containment:
inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.The revision surgery was completed successfully.Device history records review
a review of the device history records (dhr) shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There was a nonconforming material report (ncmr (b)(4)) associated with part number 508-36-103, glenoid head w/ retaining screw, rsp, 36mm, -4mm, which documented that out of 11 parts in the lot, 2 parts were rejected due to dings on the counterbore greater than 0.040 inch that could be detected with a feeler gauge.The rejected parts were scrapped and not released for distribution, while the remaining 9 parts met fit, form, and function requirements and were accepted for use.The device was verified to have undergone an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Complaint history:
customer complaint history of the reported device(s) showed no present trends or ongoing issues that need review.
|